“Stone Blames Alexander Reception on American Youth” (Contactmusic.com)

Oliver Stone blames the abyssmal failure of his flopbuster “Alexander” on “inevitable result of America’s youth misunderstanding ancient history.” What he should be blaming is a) his own continued misreading of history and b) his unfulfilling way of telling whatever history he’s trying to convey. Especially in this movie. The scenes with Ptolemy (Anthony Hopkins) were so awful: the lighting was stark and unnatural, the backdrop was so poorly integrated with the set, and the set design looked cheap and artificial; it lacked refining.

Then, Stone casts Brad Pitt Colin Farrell as Alexander. Sorry, but Brad Pitt Colin Farrell has no Pathos to convey, so he was a terrible choice. He’s a very talented actor (think 12 Monkeys), but definitely the wrong guy for the job. Like all movies in that price range, it had some amazing CG moments, but CG does not a movie make. There has to be story. In fact, in movie making, story is everything and the only thing. Everything else about the movie (the music, the sound, the CG, etc.) should all be in service to story. However, like most Hollywood movies nowadays, story isn’t king. It’s the CG, or the movie stars, or the director that is touted above story, and in the case of “Alexander” Stone’s garbled the story, as he ususally does, so what was left was a shill of a movie.

Stone’s best quote from the article above:

“My reputation has been battered to death so many times, I’m surprised I’m still alive.”

So are we. To quote a song from Team America: “Why does Michael Bay get to keep on making movies?” Just substitute Ollies’ name instead.


UPDATE: I corrected myself to mean “Colin Farrell” not Brad Pitt. I had just watched “Troy” when I made this post, so I had Brad Pitt on the brain I guess. Sigh. Thanks to Sheldon for pointing that out.